[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Missing cache flush.
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 07:01:28PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Whether this works depends on the cache line replacement policy.
> It will always work with LRU, for example, and probably
> everything else that exists. But it is not guaranteed, is it?

LFU, if used, wouldn't be flushed by this trick... Potentially, you could
have a slice of kernel interrupt handler sitting in a cache line, having
been accessed $BIG_NUMBER times... (Does anything actually use this
approach, though???)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.159 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site