[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> La Monte H.P. Yarroll writes:
> > Matt D. Robinson writes:
> > > Is there any way to add in the capability to _replace_ TCP with
> > > your own, so you can use your own layer?
> And I will never in my lifetime allow such a facility to be added to
> the Linux kernel.
> This allows people to make proprietary implementations of TCP under
> Linux. And we don't want this just as we don't want to add a way to
> allow someone to do a proprietary Linux VM.

Then again, maybe someone has a reason to use a different
TCP stack, ie to support something like a high-availiblity stack
between two different machines...

Why would you be scared of a proprietary TCP stack? If Open Source
is so much better (and I believe it is), then there would be nothing
to lose. And if the new stack helped a small subset of people who would
otherwise have an even sorrier life implementing it on some other
platform, then that is better, right?

Ben Greear <> <>
President of Candela Technologies Inc
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.929 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site