Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:20:12 -0400 (EDT) | | From | "Mike A. Harris" <> | | Subject | Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps |
| |
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Dr S.M. Huen wrote:
>> For large memory boxes, this is ridiculous. Should I have 8GB of swap? >> > >Do I understand you correctly? >ECC grade SDRAM for your 8GB server costs £335 per GB as 512MB sticks even >at today's silly prices (Crucial). Ultra160 SCSI costs £8.93/GB as 73GB >drives.
Linux is all about technical correctness, and doing the job properly. It isn't about "there is a bug in the kernel, but that is ok because a 8Gb swapfile only costs $2"
Why are half the people here trying to hide behind this diskspace is cheap argument? If we rely on that, then Linux sucks shit.
The problem IMHO is widely acknowledged by those who matter as an official BUG, and that is that. It is also acknowledged widely by those who can fix the problem that it will be fixed in time.
So technically speaking - the kernel has a widely known bug/misfeature, which is acknowledged by core kernel developers as needing fixing, and that it will get fixed at some point.
Saying it is a nonissue due to the cost of hardware resources is just plain Microsoft attitude and holds absolutely zero technical merit.
It *IS* an issue, because it is making Linux suck, and is causing REAL WORLD PROBLEMS. The use 2x RAM is nothing more than a bandaid workaround, so don't claim that it is the proper fix due to big wallet size.
I have 2.2 doing a software build that takes 40 minutes with 256Mb of RAM, and 1G of swap. The same build on 2.4 takes 60 minutes. That is 4x RAM for swap.
Lowering the swap down to 2x RAM makes no difference in the numbers, down to 1x RAM the 2.4 build slows down horrendously, and droping the swap to 20Mb makes it die completely in 2.4.
2.4 is fine for a firewall, or certain other applications, but regardless of the amount of SWAP, I'll take the 40minute build using 2.2 over the 60minute build using 2.4 anyday.
This is the real world. And no cost isn't an issue to me. Putting another 80Gb drive in this box for swap isn't going to help the work get done any faster.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open Source advocate Opinions and viewpoints expressed are solely my own. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |