[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Missing cache flush.
>  - it is buggy and will lock up some CPU's. Use with EXTREME CAUTION.
> Intel set a special field in the MP table for whether wbinval is
> usable or not, and you can probably find their errata on which CPU's
> it doesn't work on (I think it was some early PPro steppings).

Also some intel chipsets it didnt work with (notably earlier PCI ones) - indeed
that seems to be the cause of the 'bzImage wont boot on XYZ 486 tosh
laptop' bug.

> On the whole, I would suggest avoiding this like the plague, and just
> marking such memory to be non-cacheable, regardless of whether there is
> a performance impact or not. If you mark it write-combining and
> speculative, it's going to perform a bit better.

Or memcpy the blocks into the block or page cache when you need them.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.117 / U:2.864 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site