[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Missing cache flush.
    >  - it is buggy and will lock up some CPU's. Use with EXTREME CAUTION.
    > Intel set a special field in the MP table for whether wbinval is
    > usable or not, and you can probably find their errata on which CPU's
    > it doesn't work on (I think it was some early PPro steppings).

    Also some intel chipsets it didnt work with (notably earlier PCI ones) - indeed
    that seems to be the cause of the 'bzImage wont boot on XYZ 486 tosh
    laptop' bug.

    > On the whole, I would suggest avoiding this like the plague, and just
    > marking such memory to be non-cacheable, regardless of whether there is
    > a performance impact or not. If you mark it write-combining and
    > speculative, it's going to perform a bit better.

    Or memcpy the blocks into the block or page cache when you need them.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.019 / U:2.268 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site