Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:51:19 -0700 (PDT) | From | Matthew Jacob <> | Subject | Re: Qlogic Fiber Channel |
| |
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Alan Cox writes: > > > =46rom my point of view, this driver is sadly broken. The fun part is t= > > > hat > > > the qlogic driver is certainly based on this one too (look at the code,= > > > the > > > drivers differs not so much).=20 > > > > And if the other one is stable someone should spend the time merging the > > two. > > Actually, I think "sadly broken" depends upon your situation. > I've been using the driver just fine on my systems here, even > during cerberus stress testing. So it is working perfectly fine > for some people.
That's actually the story of Fibre Channel.
What is cerberus testing?
Try the following: try issuing a LIP every 180 seconds for 24 hours during load with auditted pattern checkers (whether local loop or fabric topologies). If you (and, haha, your fabric switches) survive that without losing data or disks, then we'll begin to talk about 'fine'.
-matt
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |