[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: VM Requirement Document - v0.0
>> * If we're getting low cache hit rates, don't flush 
>> processes to swap.
>> * If we're getting good cache hit rates, flush old, idle
>> processes to swap.

Rik> ... but I fail to see this one. If we get a low cache hit rate,
Rik> couldn't that just mean we allocated too little memory for the
Rik> cache ?

maybe more specific: If the hit-rate is low and the cache is already
70+% of the systems memory, the chances maybe slim that more cache is
going to improve the hit-rate.

I do not care much whether the cache is using 99% of the systems memory
or 50%. As long as there is free memory, using it for cache is great. I
care a lot if the cache takes down interactivity, because it pushes out
processes that it thinks idle, but that I need in 5 seconds. The caches
pressure against processes should decrease with the (relative) size of
the cache. Especially in low hit-rate situations.

OT: I asked the question before somewhere else. Are there interfaces to
the VM that expose the various cache sizes and, more important,
hit-rates to userland? I would love to see (or maybe help writing in my
free time) a tool to just visualize/analyze the efficiency of the VM

Martin Knoblauch | email:
TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309
C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 | Mobile: +49-170-4904759
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.056 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site