Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:48:37 +0200 | From | "J . A . Magallon" <> | Subject | Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) |
| |
This discussion seems to go nowhere. Thanks for your comments. I know much more on Linux than before.
I am happy that processes in Linux are so marvelous. Linux does not need a decent POSIX threads implementation because the same functionality can be achived with processes. Do what you like, you write the kernel code. I could write my soft using fork special fetaures in Linux. But I want it to be portable. If threads in linux are so bad, it is bad luck for me. I will go slow. It its the only portable way todo afordable shared memory threading without filling your program of shm-xxxx.
-- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.5-ac17 #2 SMP Fri Jun 22 01:36:07 CEST 2001 i686 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |