lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[OT] gcc 2.95.2 vs. 3.0 (fwd)
first of all, if you are not interested in compiler comparision, just
skip.

I though posting a little demonstration of how well performing code gcc
2.95.2 generates (vs. gcc 3.0) won't hurt. Also shown, that further
optimatizations are anything but impossible (using Intel's commercial c
compiler).

I know opendivx code is not like kernel code at all, but on the other hand
it is well suited for benchmark testing.

Maybe this will cool down thoose a bit, who were to move to gcc 3.0 as
fast as possible, for the _way_ better generated code...

--
SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:sape@sch.hu - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 04:31:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Arpi <arpi@thot.banki.hu>
Reply-To: mplayer-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: mplayer-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Mplayer-users] gcc 2.95.2 vs. 3.0

Hi,

Just compiled and try gcc 3.0 stable.
And the results is very big surprise! It makes *SLOWER* code!

test file: (opendivx with postprocessing, this stuff is written in C)
# mplayer -osdlevel 0 -nosound -benchmark 1800.avi -vo null -pp 15
VIDEO: [divx] 640x352 24bpp 23.98 fps 1865.1 kbps (227.7 kbyte/s)

hardware: celeron-2 600 @ 900MHz (100MHz FSB), 256MB RAM (PC133, at 2/2/2)
(sse,mmx,mmxext enabled)

gcc 2.95.2 result: (flags: -O4 -march=i686 -mcpu=i686 -pipe -ffast-math)
BENCHMARKs: V: 5.087s VO: 0.001s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.013s = 5.101s
BENCHMARK%: V: 99.7160% VO: 0.0258% A: 0.0000% Sys: 0.2582% = 100.0000%

gcc 3.0 result: (flags: -O4 -march=i686 -mcpu=i686 -pipe -ffast-math)
BENCHMARKs: V: 5.194s VO: 0.001s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.013s = 5.208s
BENCHMARK%: V: 99.7309% VO: 0.0221% A: 0.0000% Sys: 0.2471% = 100.0000%

yes, speed diff isn't big, but i was prepared for big speed boost by 3.0,
and then i got speed loss! :(

if i recompile C-only parts of decore with intel's commercial C compiler
(free beta available for linux), it's about 15% faster:

icc result: (optim. flags: -O2 -fp -rcd -tpp6 -xiMK)
BENCHMARKs: V: 4.415s VO: 0.001s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.013s = 4.429s
BENCHMARK%: V: 99.6676% VO: 0.0290% A: 0.0000% Sys: 0.3034% = 100.0000%


A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team

--
mailto:arpi@thot.banki.hu
http://esp-team.scene.hu

_______________________________________________
Mplayer-users mailing list
Mplayer-users@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mplayer-users

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.039 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site