Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 24 Jun 2001 02:16:01 +0200 (CEST) | From | Luigi Genoni <> | Subject | Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy? |
| |
The point was that Stimits says that on its Red Hat 7.1 he has no ldscripts directory, and so no files like elf_i386.x and so on. I was just surprised, since i know thay are all necessary to /usr/bin/ld to work.
Then he was alo wondering why he has two libc /lib/libc.so.6 and /lib/i686/libc.so.6, one is tripped and the other contains debug symbols. I can figure why, but he adfirms that /lib/i686 is not included in /etc/ld.so.conf, there is no preload configured, but this is the directory used by the loader to find the libc to load.
I have to red hat installed, so i was trying to figure out how things are working on new releases (my last red hat was 6.2 when i was working at red hat Italy).
Bests Luigi
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > glad to know this, i do wonder how does /usr/bin/ld work for red hat. > > to my old mentality this seems red hat is going out of any resonable > > standard. > > It works like /usr/bin/ld on any other platform I know of > > > if the same libc stripped would not run library, and they HAVE to mantein > > a libc.so.6 linside of /lib, otherway this would be too mutch against > > a resonable standard. > > bash-2.04$ ls -l /lib/libc.so.6 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 May 14 16:46 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.2.2.so > > I don't follow the discussion here. >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |