[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Controversy over dynamic linking -- how to end the panic
    Andrew Pimlott <>:
    > On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:17:16PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
    > > IANAL, but I believe that Linus's position as anthology copyright holder
    > > makes him privileged in this respect.
    > Regardless of what you find in the books, recall that Linus has
    > stated that decentralizing the copyright of Linux was a goal, so you
    > may not find him willing to claim an "anthology copyright" (if such
    > a thing even applies to the kernel, which in my NAL opinion, it does
    > not).

    Linus *is*, however, implicitly claiming the authority to make license
    policy on behalf of the other copyright holders in cases where the GPL
    is unclear.

    In COPYING, Linus says that that the version of GPL applying to the
    kernel is v2 unless explicitly otherwise stated. He has also already
    issued the interpretation that normal system calls from userland do
    not create a derivation relationship.

    I consider Linus to have the moral right to make these decisions, whether
    or not the law gives him a formal legal right to do so. All I have done
    is propose that he be more explicit about his policy in order to prevent
    needless confusion and nervousness.
    <a href="">Eric S. Raymond</a>

    The possession of arms by the people is the ultimate warrant
    that government governs only with the consent of the governed.
    -- Jeff Snyder
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.026 / U:1.972 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site