[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Controversy over dynamic linking -- how to end the panic
Date (Andrew Pimlott)
>I agree entirely that Linus, as creator of the license, is
>privileged with respect to interpretation of the license. I

Richard Stallman is the creator of the license. It's his greatest work.
Linus is in no way priviledged as to interpretation of it, other than
tolerance on the part of the parties that own the copyright to the

The GPL is about "the program". As far as I'm concerned, modules are the
kernel, "the program". The way to stem any panic that may exist, if you
want to allow binary-only modules (which sucks*, but whatever), is to LGPL
or "KGPL" the kernel. What is being allowed now is in violation of the

Rick Hohensee

*How 'bout a nice binary-only Forth running the kernel? Metacompiling
kernel routines into the Forth dictionary and such. Sound creepy? Good.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.067 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site