[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Missing help entries in 2.4.6pre5

On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

> The following configuration symbols in 2.4.6pre5 do not have
> entries,:

1- This symbol is mine;
2- It is part of 2.4.6-pre5 only as a dependency argument, with no
point where a value is actually assigned to it;
3- It is likely to be different when the actual question for which the
user need an help text is merged into the mainline kernel.

So you can safely ignore it for now.

Maybe it could be a good thing for your tool to ignore missing help text for
symbols that don't get enabled interactively by the user?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.070 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site