[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Controversy over dynamic linking -- how to end the panic
** Reply to message from Mike Harrold <> on Thu, 21 Jun 2001
15:04:21 -0400 (EDT)

> Not to mention utterly unenforceable. Consider:
> 1) Oracle Corp. builds their database for Linux on a Linux system.
> 2) Said system comes with standard header files, which happen in this case to
> be GPL'd header files.
> 3) Oracle Corp.'s database becomes GPL.
> There's not a court in the civilised world that would uphold the GPL in that
> scenario.

I do believe, however, that in these cases the header files in question are
under the LGPL, which does specifically allow linking and #including in non-GPL
and non-LGPL code.

In my opinion, this whole thing would just go away (including some of
Microsoft's anti-GPL rants), if the FSF officially declared that under the GPL,
#including a GPL header file does NOT force your code to be also GPL.

Timur Tabi -
Interactive Silicon -

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.136 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site