[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Controversy over dynamic linking -- how to end the panic
    ** Reply to message from Wei Weng <> on 21 Jun 2001 16:01:58

    > Hell, why does the linux community need to care about other *greedy*
    > people who don't want to GPL their work anyway? If you want to protect
    > GPL as the principle in Linux, well, screw the device driver makers!

    Unfortunately, your position will result in reduce hardware support. There are
    companies out there that will not release the source code to their drivers. By
    preventing binary-only drivers, you're basically telling those companies, "I
    don't care who needs your hardware to work under Linux, I won't let you ship
    your drivers."

    Besides, your opinion on this matter is irrelevant. Linus has already decided
    to allow binary-only drivers. The question is not WHETHER it is allowed, but
    HOW it will be allowed. Please stay on topic.

    > What is the difference between including kernel header file and
    > including GPLed header file?

    None, as far as I know, and that's the problem. By Linus saying, "including
    kernel header files doesn't make your driver a derivative work", he is
    effectively _weakening_ a provision in the GPL _as a whole_ (assuming that you
    believe including header files makes your work a derivative, which I don't).

    Timur Tabi -
    Interactive Silicon -

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.021 / U:20.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site