[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)
At 18:31 -0500 2001-06-19, Timur Tabi wrote:
>Not quite. What makes OS/2's threads superior is that the OS multitasks
>threads, not processes. So I can create a time-critical thread in my process,
>and it will have priority over ALL threads in ALL processes.

In contrast to Linux, which does exactly the same thing -- so what
are you trying to tell us?

>A lot of OS/2 software is written with this feature in mind. I know of one
>programmer who absolutely hates Linux because it's just too difficult porting
>software to it, and the lack of decent thread support is part of the problem.

So what would you consider to be "decent thread support"?

Matthias Urlichs
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.085 / U:3.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site