[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [VLAN] Re: Should VLANs be devices or something else?

Ben Greear wrote:
> "David S. Miller" wrote:

> > Conceptually, svr4 streams are a beautiful and elegant
> > mechanism. :-)
> >
> > Technical implementation level concerns need to be considered
> > as well as "does it look nice".
> I found it to be the easiest way to implement things. It allowed
> me to not have to touch any of layer 3, and I did not have to patch
> any user-space program like ip or ifconfig.
> I'm not even sure if the nay-sayers ever had another idea, they
> just didn't like having lots of interfaces. Originally, there
> were claims of inefficiency, but it seems that other than things
> like 'ip' and ifconfig, there are no serious performance problems
> I am aware of.

There is the issue with netlink notification of large number of events.
See the mail thread starting from:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.087 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site