Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 17 Jun 2001 01:40:33 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] HotPlug CPU patch against 2.4.5 |
| |
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <200106161359.f5GDxQ214335@ns.caldera.de> you write: > > In article <m15BG8K-001UIwC@mozart> you wrote: > > > # Up... > > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/cpu/1 > > > > Wouldn't /proc/sys/cpu/<num>/enable be better? This way other per-cpu > > sysctls could be added more easily... > > Yep. But rewrite the sysctl crap first to make dynamically adding and > deleting entries sane.
I had, actually. 2.5 stuff, but as soon as fs/super.c merge gets into the sane area I'll see what can be safely merged into 2.4. Sorry - it touches quite a few places and running two splitups in parallel... <shudder> As soon as this fscking roll of barbwire^W^W^Wset of locking changes gets untangled...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |