Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 16 Jun 2001 19:27:53 +0100 | From | Rachel Greenham <> | Subject | Re: VIA KT133A crash *post* 2.4.3-ac6 |
| |
Christian Bornträger wrote:
>>If possible, can you remove the hard disc from the promise and attach it on >>the VIA-Controller and test if the problem still occurs? (prepare a bootdisc >>if you cannot boot. Propably, you have to pass a new root-partition to the >>kernel) >>I hardly believe that the promise controller has some problems with the new >>VIA setup introduced in 2.4.3-ac7. Using the promise ports of the A7V133 is >>the only correlation I see again and again... >> Yes, plugging the drive into the primary VIA IDE port, it seems to work perfectly. Am now on 2.4.5-ac14 with UDMA5 enabled and it seems quite happy.
Which would seem to indicate that yes, it *is* a Promise issue - or at least a Promise-on-VIA issue.
FWIW the Promise BIOS announces itself as version 2.01 build 35.
erk...
Thus far I've been presuming that the Promise IDE ports were UDMA100/66/33 and the VIA IDE ports were UDMA66/33, and thus naturally wanted to use the Promise ports to get better performance. Now, on more careful reading of the manual, it seems to be telling me that *all* of the IDE ports are UDMA100/66/33, the main benefit of the Promise chip besides being able to plug more IDE devices in, being the RAID 0 support (which I don't need [yet]). Then, on looking again at the bonnie *results* (rather than just noting that it hadn't *crashed*), I notice that the figures are about the same, possibly marginally better, than those I was getting out of the Promise ports.
And there I thought I'd have to be slumming it... Doh! :-} <sheepish/>
-- Rachel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |