lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Minor "cleanup" patches for 2.4.5-ac kernels
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:03:23PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > > --- linux-2.4.5ac/drivers/pci/quirks.c~ Tue Jun 12 16:31:12 2001
> > > +++ linux-2.4.5ac/drivers/pci/quirks.c Tue Jun 12 17:13:18 2001
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/pci.h>
> > > #include <linux/init.h>
> > > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > +#include <linux/sched.h>
> > >
> > > #undef DEBUG
> > >
> > > There is no problem if SMP is not configured.
> >
> > no the better place for this is include/asm-i386/delay.h.
>
> You mean to put "#include <linux/sched.h>" into include/linux/delay.h?
> Otherwise this will not help very much on Alpha when I run into
> the problem; or other architectures. :-) Works for me and indeed
> it may be a better place.

This is an architecture-level thing. include/asm-$arch/delay not
include/linux/delay.h

Currently, Alpha does not need to include sched.h at all...


> > Then Andrea suggested to
> > simply un-inline udelay, which solved the compile problem in an even
> > better way. (we cannot un-inline udelay on x86 I think)
>
> How about other architectures? Each will need an individual treatment?

Each arch will need individual treatment, but each alpha should decide
for itself whether or not to un-inline udelay. It may not be possible
on some archs.

--
Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse.
Building 1024 |
MandrakeSoft |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.142 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site