[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: threading question
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:28:32PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> There are really only two reasons for threaded programming.
> - Poor programmer skills/language expression of event handling

The converse is that pthreads are:

- Very easy to use from C at a reasonable runtime overhead

It is very convenient for a userspace coder to be able to just start a
function in a different thread. Now it might be so that a kernel is not
there to provide ease of use for userspace coders but it is a factor.

I see lots of people only using:
no signals

My gut feeling is that you could implement this subset in a way that is both
fast and right - although it would not be 'pthreads compliant'. Can anybody
confirm this feeling?



-- Versatile DNS Services
Trilab The Technology People
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.101 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site