[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: unregistered changes to the user<->kernel API

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Richard Henderson wrote:

> Yes, I saw those. What is the effect of O_NOFOLLOW? To not
> follow symbolic links when opening the file. If you open a
> regular file, in effect nothing happens. Moreover, if these
> opens were not finding files now, the system wouldn't work.
> So: the effect, I suppose, is (1) disabling some security
> within glibc, and (2) making these accesses slower since they
> will be considered O_DIRECT after the change.
> Which doesn't seem that life-threatening to me.

O_NOFOLLOW is used to deal with symlink attacks. Breaking it means
that for quite a few binaries you are opening security holes. And
since it's a flagday change, you'll get the situation when no version
will work for all kernels. Bad idea, IMO.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.080 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site