[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregistertable
Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
> ^^^^^^^^^
> Preferred by whom? The FSF? Richard Stallman? Hackers in general when
> they take a vote? Programmers in general? What if the market is full of
> VB programmers who prefer VB? What if none of them know assembly? They
> might all vote that assembly isn't a preferred form. If they aren't the
> ones who count, then who does? Maybe the authors count for more than
> other people? If so then it does seem they might like to write binaries
> because they're crazy and they think it's fun or something. I think that
> the intention of the GPL is clear here but the language is not...

The intention _is_ clear indeed. That ought to be all we need really.
If it comes to the worst and somneone in court claims that binary
is their preferred form for _modification_ - have them demonstrate their
way of working to prove it can be done. "Now write 'hello world'
in binary. Wow, you managed that! Now add a triple loop to it..."
This could be really interesting.

Somehow, I believe a driver written directly in binary (without even
assembly source) would be easy to reimplement from scratch in C.
Because it'd be so small.

Helge Hafting
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.060 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site