[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2.4.5-ac8
> > Sure, it's a pretty interaction.  To be sure about the rule: any *_user
> > call can be treated as an implicit invocation of do_page_fault?
> As a first approximation, yes. The exception cases are certain callers
> that use kernel addresses and set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in order to "fake"
> arguments to system calls etc, but I doubt they should need any
> special-casing.

I already have to special case the set_fs calls for the user-pointer
security checker. It shouldn't be too much trouble to reuse the code.
Thanks for the early warning.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.030 / U:1.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site