[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: page_launder() bug

On Wed, 9 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:

> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> > You want writepage() to check/clean the referenced bit and move the page
> > to the active list itself ?
> Well, that's the other part of what my patch was doing.
> Let me state it a different way, how is the new writepage() framework
> going to do things like ignore the referenced bit during page_launder
> for dead swap pages?

Its not able to ignore the referenced bit.

I know we want that, but I can't see any clean way of doing that.

Suggestions ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.087 / U:2.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site