Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up | Date | Tue, 8 May 2001 16:15:08 +0200 (MEST) | From | (Rogier Wolff) |
| |
Eric S. Raymond wrote: > More generally, arguments of the form "Non-mainline custom hack X > could invalidate constraint Y, therefore we can't have Y in the > rulebase" are dangerous -- I suspect you could reduce your set of > constraints to nil very quickly that way, and thus badly screw over > the 99% of people who just want to build a more or less stock kernel.
Eric,
Still being able to use the "tool" is useful! So I want a "don't mess with me" mode where I'd get more control than 99% of the lusers....
Roger.
-- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. * There are also old, bald pilots. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |