Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Albert D. Cahalan" <> | Subject | Re: OT: ps source? | Date | Tue, 8 May 2001 17:04:15 -0400 (EDT) |
| |
Pierre Rousselet writes: > James Bourne wrote:
>> From the procps man page: >> Albert Cahalan <acahalan@cs.uml.edu> rewrote ps for full >> Unix98 and BSD support, along with some ugly hacks for >> obsolete and foreign syntax. >> >> Michael K. Johnson <johnsonm@redhat.com> is the current >> maintainer.
There has been a bit of a fork actually... sorry.
> Right. For international support procps-2.0.7 is the one to choose with > the patch procps-2.0.7-intl.patch.
That one is quite buggy. The parser is broken ("ps -o %p" fails), you can get a core dump if you get unlucky with the System.map file, the BSD-style process selection is incorrect... I've fixed about 100 bugs and introduced only a few.
What you really ought to use is the Debian package. That gives you my source plus a few fixes that I don't have yet. Head over to www.debian.org and drill down to the "unstable" package. There you will find a source tarball and a patch file for it.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |