[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 support
    On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
    > On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:19:09PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > This only leaves two issues, the first is device drivers and the
    > second is the question whether we'd want the overhead needed to
    > implement the (fairly easy) memory relocation.
    > How do you relocate
    > -- pages which are mlocked without violating RT contraints?

    Fuck RT constraints. Linux doesn't have infinitely small
    scheduling latencies, it's easy to copy a page without
    increasing the scheduling latencies much.

    > -- pages which contain kernel pointers and might be accessed from
    > interrupt context?

    Block interrupts while copying a kernel page?

    Remember that this is an emergency situation, so it's ok
    to use "big hammer" solutions.


    Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
    However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

    Send all your spam to (spam digging piggy)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.020 / U:3.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site