Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 4 May 2001 06:59:42 +0200 (CEST) | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Subject | Re: iso9660 endianness cleanup patch |
| |
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Pavel Machek writes: > > > It should ot break anything. gcc decides its bad to inline it, so it > > does not inline it. Small code growth at worst. Compiler has right to > > make your code bigger or slower, if it decides to do so. > > Oh come on. The logical way: > > inline Compiler must inline (only!) or report an error.
That's doable now.. if the code is otherwise warning free.
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |