[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: OOPS with 2.4.5 [kernel BUG at inode.c:486]
>>>>> " " == Alexander Viro <> writes:

> On 30 May 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:

>> Al: Is there any reason why the cases
>> if (!inode->i_nlink)
>> and the 'magic nfs path' should be treated differently?
>> Personally, I'd rather prefer to merge the 2.

> I don't think that it's a good idea. Why not fry the cache
> explicitly when you invalidate the inode?

Won't there be a race there? Imagine if some other process is busy
writing to that inode, and happens to add a new page after we've

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.031 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site