[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Plain 2.4.5 VM... (and 2.4.5-ac3)
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:

> On Tuesday 29 May 2001 15:16, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > a reasonably stable release until 2.2.12. I do not understand why
> > > code with such serious reproducible problems is being introduced into
> > > the even numbered kernels. What happened to the plan to use only the
> >
> > Who said it was introduced ?? It was more 'lurking' than introduced. And
> > unfortunately nobody really pinned it down in 2.4test.
> >
> I fail to see the distinction. First of all, why was it ever released
> as 2.4-test? That question should probably be directed at Linus. If
> it is not fully tested, then it should be released it as an odd
> number. If it already existed in the odd numbered development kernel
> and was known, then it should have never been released as a production
> kernel until it was resolved. Otherwise, it completely defeats the
> purpose of having the even/odd numbering system.
> I do not expect bugs to never slip through to production kernels, but
> known bugs that are not trivial should not, and serious bugs like
> these VM problems especially should not.

And you can help prevent them from slipping through by signing up as a
shake and bake tester. Indeed, you can make your expectations reality
absolutely free of charge, <microfont> and or compensation </microfont>
what a bargain!

X ___________________ ;-)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.038 / U:2.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site