Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 03 May 2001 10:53:08 +0200 | From | Abramo Bagnara <> | Subject | Re: unsigned long ioremap()? |
| |
Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > > > That's indeed the reason to change ioremap prototype for 2.5. > > > > > > Say what?? > > > > > > > Please give a look > > http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0008.1/0338.html > > http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0008.1/0407.html > > > > This was something that already got a wide consent. > > Let's not return unsigned long -- DaveM's suggestion is far better. > unsigned long is not opaque enough, IMHO.
I'm not sure to understand what's the proposed way to do offsetting:
#define IO_ADDR(cookie, ofs)? (maybe with #define IO_SADDR(cookie, struct_name, field)) Others?
-- Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramo@alsa-project.org
Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy
ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org It sounds good! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |