[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux Cluster using shared scsi
At 3:57 PM -0400 2001-05-03, Eric Z. Ayers wrote:
>However distateful it sounds, there is precedent for the
>behavior that Doug is proposing in commercial clustering
>implementations. My recollection is that both Compaq TruCluster and
>HP Service Guard have logic that will panic the kernel when a disk is
>"stolen" from under a running service and there is a "network
>partition" in the cluster.
>A network partition occurs when multiple machines in the cluster are
>runnig, but the HA software agents on two nodes can't communicate via
>the network to arbitrate which node should be the owner of the disk.

There are also the more extreme STONITH and STOMITH [shoot the other
node/machine in the head] required by some shared filesystems (eg
/Jonathan Lundell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.214 / U:3.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site