[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug, fix, 2.4.5
David S. Miller
> Ingo Molnar writes:

>> (unlike bottom halves, soft-IRQs do not preempt kernel code.)
> ...
> Since when do we have this rule? :-)
> You should check Softirqs on return from every single IRQ.
> In do_softirq() it will make sure that we won't run softirqs
> while already doing so or being already nested in a hard-IRQ.
> Every port works this way, I don't know where you got this "soft-IRQs
> cannot run when returning to kernel code" rule, it simply doesn't
> exist.

After you two argue this out, please toss a note in Documentation.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.156 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site