lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux-2.4.5
    On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:11:15PM -0400, Ben LaHaise wrote:
    > No. It does not fix the deadlock. Neither does the patch you posted.

    can you give a try if you can deadlock 2.4.5aa1 just in case, and post a
    SYSRQ+T + system.map if it still deadlocks?

    > But, if you're going to add a reserve pool for buffer heads and bounce
    > pages, please do it with generic, not yet another special case hack.

    The reserved pool for buffer heads is there since the first time I used
    linux I think. I won't certainly object to convert all reserved pool to
    an unified interface, as I'd like if all hashtables would be also sized
    with an unified interface, but that's just a stylistic issue, at least
    for 2.4 that's a very secondary object compared to people who can get
    dealdocks during production.

    Andrea
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.021 / U:0.492 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site