Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 26 May 2001 11:40:42 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Linux-2.4.5 |
| |
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:21:18AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Sat, 26 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > > I didn't checked the alloc_pages() other thing mentioned by Ben, if > > > alloc_pages() deadlocks internally that's yet another completly > > > orthogonal bug and that will be addressed by another patch if it > > > persists. > > > > O, that part is fixed by the patch that Linus threw away > > yesterday ;) > > what are you smoking?
I am smoking the "tested the patch and wasn't able to reproduce a deadlock" stuff.
> I read your patch and there's nothing related to > such fix in your patch.
I explained the thing to you about 5 times now. If you don't have the time to understand the deadlock, please don't try to confuse the issue by sending out non-fixes.
Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |