[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux-2.4.5
    On Sat, 26 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:21:18AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > On Sat, 26 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > >
    > > > I didn't checked the alloc_pages() other thing mentioned by Ben, if
    > > > alloc_pages() deadlocks internally that's yet another completly
    > > > orthogonal bug and that will be addressed by another patch if it
    > > > persists.
    > >
    > > O, that part is fixed by the patch that Linus threw away
    > > yesterday ;)
    > what are you smoking?

    I am smoking the "tested the patch and wasn't able to reproduce
    a deadlock" stuff.

    > I read your patch and there's nothing related to
    > such fix in your patch.

    I explained the thing to you about 5 times now. If you don't
    have the time to understand the deadlock, please don't try
    to confuse the issue by sending out non-fixes.

    Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
    However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

    Send all your spam to (spam digging piggy)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.020 / U:39.612 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site