lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux-2.4.5
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:36:22AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > No Comment(tm) *grin*
> >
> > I'm having lots of fun, thanks.
>
> Now _this_ is tweaking magic limits ;)

Others agreed that the real source of the create_buffers could be just
too few reserved pages in the unused_list, the unused_list is the only
"deadlock avoidance logic" designed to avoid create_buffers to deadlock,
so I really don't see why you don't listen to me and you just assume my
idea is obviously wrong while it obviously isn't. The only thing I can
do is to laugh while reading your illogical "No Comment(tm) *grin*",
if I would take such comment serously I would just ignore the VM and
stay in other subsystem where those funny things never happens as far I
can tell, which I'm not going to do just because of your new funny "No
Comment(tm) *grin*". If for any reason you notice I somehow invite those
things to happen please let me know and I will certainly try to get
better from my part.

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.090 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site