[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] struct char_device

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:54:15PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2001 wrote:
> > > But I don't want an initrd.
> > Don't be afraid of words. You wouldnt notice - it would do its
> > job and disappear just like piggyback today.
> Andries, initrd code is _sick_. Our boot sequence is not a wonder of
> elegance, but that crap is the worst part. I certainly can understand
> people not wanting to use that on aesthetical reasons alone.

It's the principle of a kernel-linked boot image, not initrd, which is
important. Unpacking a cramfs image from an __init section is much
cleaner than initrd and has almost the same effect: the boot
filesystem just ends up readonly that way. Either way we can hook
in that default user-space code at boot time transparently.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.039 / U:0.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site