Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Paul Fulghum" <> | Subject | Re: SyncPPP IPCP/LCP loop problem and patch | Date | Thu, 24 May 2001 10:56:11 -0600 |
| |
From: <rjd@xyzzy.clara.co.uk> > Linux syncppp does not have a LCP_STATE_REQ_SENT ... [snip] > Who's the owner for syncppp.c ? I might be able to put some time in on > it, but would hate to be sending patches into empty space.
I'm not sure anyone is willing to claim ownership :)
I did not realize that syncppp does not implement all the RFC1661 states. That's simply broken :( A proper state machine implementation would be nice.
On the other hand, it works in a minimal way for most people and it's supposed to be folded into the generic PPP implementation someday. So there's not much point in trying to overhaul the code.
Paul Fulghum paulkf@microgate.com Microgate Corporation www.microgate.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |