Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy | Date | Mon, 21 May 2001 13:31:10 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> > 2) Have a HACKERS submenu system which contains all the derivations > > that could *possibly* be un-defaulted, and allow our intrepid hacker > > to explicitly force each to a value or leave unset. > > I prefer the former, which is how it's already implemented in CML1.
Its called Debugging in CML1 in -ac for a reason btw. Because its called debugging I get plenty of reports that start
"I dont know much about this but I turned on all the debugging options and now instead of hanging it says Oops 0xA5A5A5A5 ..."
which are a lot more useful.
Names matter a lot
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |