[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup)

On Sat, 19 May 2001 wrote:

> > A lot of stuff relies on the fact that close(open(foo, O_RDONLY))
> > is a no-op. Breaking that assumption is a Bad Thing(tm).
> Also here I would like to agree. Unfortunately this is false.
> Opening device files often has interesting side effects.

Too bad. They can be triggered by similar races between attacker
changing the type of object (file<->symlink) and backup.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.038 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site