lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Brown-paper-bag bug in m68k, sparc, and sparc64 config files
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

> This bug unconditionally disables a configuration question -- and it's
> so old that it has propagated across three port files, without either
> of the people who did the cut and paste for the latter two noticing it.

in fact it was originally in i386 too. I noticed and fixed it,
didn't even think about the other archs.

> This sort of thing would never ship in CML2, because the compiler
> would throw an undefined-symbol warning on BLK_DEV_ST. The temptation
> to engage in sarcastic commentary at the expense of people who still
> think CML2 is an unnecessary pain in the butt is great. But I will

Most of these people don't seem to have been subscribed to kbuild-devel
anyway, and missed most of the commentary over the past months.

> - if [ "$CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ST" != "n" ]; then
> + if [ "$CONFIG_CHR_DEV_ST" != "n" ]; then

john

--
"A reasonable probability is the only certainty."
- E. W. Howe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.037 / U:1.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site