| Subject | Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up | Date | Fri, 18 May 2001 16:39:57 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> > (c) Decide not to support this case and document the fact in the > > rulesfile. If you're going put gunge on the VME bus that replaces > > the SBC's on-board facilities, you can hand-hack your own configs. > > In general this is the best option, if you create a non-standard > configuration for machine foo then it is your problem, not everybody > else's.
Which makes CML2 inferior to CML1 again. Now if it could parse CML1 rulesets this whole discussion wouldn't be needed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|