lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
Date
From
> On 05/18/2001 at 02:44:07 PM esr@thyrsus.com wrote:
> >But the real question is whether the old tools have enough value to be
> >worth the effort. What problem are you trying to solve here?
>
> How about:
> 1. Some of us are perfectly satisfied with the existing tools and don't want
> them to be yanked out from under us.

> 2. Some of us have no interest in Python and don't like being forced to deal
> with installing/upgrading it just for CML2.

Since someone is rewriting CML2 in C that #2 is a non issue. #1 may be a case
of bolting alternative ui's onto the parser

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.048 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site