[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
Alan Cox <>:
> Being able to turn CML2 into CML1 might be the more useful exercise.

That's...not a completely crazy idea. Hmmm...

It might be possible to take a CML2 rulebase and generate a sort of stupid
jackleg CML1 translation of it. The resulting would be huge
and nasty, and would only work in forward sequence with no side-effect
computation, but you just might be able to get the old tools to parse it.

Again there's a technical problem with derivations. Probably solvable.

But the real question is whether the old tools have enough value to be
worth the effort. What problem are you trying to solve here?
<a href="">Eric S. Raymond</a>

This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were
no religion in it.
-- John Adams, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.179 / U:2.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site