[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
On Friday 18 May 2001 17:11, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > (a) Back off the capability approach. That is, accept that
> > people doing configuration are going to explicitly and
> > exhaustively specify low-level hardware.
> <snip>
> > I don't want to do (a); it conflicts with my design objective of
> > simplifying configuration enough that Aunt Tillie can do it. I
> > won't do that unless I see a strong consensus that it's the only
> > Right Thing.
> Aunt Tillie doesn't even know what a kernel is, nor does she want to.

A little presumptuous, no? I do in fact know an 'Aunt Tillie' type who
configures her own kernel. When she gets stuck she calls for help from
her son, who is a computer geek.

> I think it's fair to assume that people who configure and compile their own
> kernel (as opposed to using the distribution supplied ones) know what they
> are doing.

Not a fair assumption, if only because everybody does it for the first

> Or at least make something like a "Expert level" question as first question, so
> that people who DO know what they are doing can select the options they want.

Yes. The hackneyed platitude that 'easy' and 'powerful' are mutually
exclusive is a statistical observation, not a law of the universe.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.908 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site