[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: mm/memory.c: Missing pte_mkyoung() on mk_pte() calls?

Two seconds after I sent the message Benjamin told me on IRC that
PAGE_ACCESSED is included in the default page protections... duh.

On Thu, 17 May 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> Linus,
> I was looking at mm/memory.c (2.4), and I've noticed that we don't call
> pte_mkyoung() on newly created pte's for most of the fault paths.
> break_cow(), for example:
> establish_pte(vma, address, page_table, pte_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(mk_pte(new_page, v ma->vm_page_prot))));
> Is there any reason why we don't set the young bit on such places ?
> I don't think that the window between the pte creation and the actual
> access of the pte by the process is always big enough to avoid kswapd (or
> other task trying to free memory) from ripping a created pte.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.057 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site