Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 17 May 2001 23:53:45 +0100 (BST) | From | Chris Evans <> | Subject | 2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN? (fwd) |
| |
Resend (no response first time)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:09:09 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Evans <chris@scary.beasts.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@redhat.com Subject: 2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN?
Hi,
Looking at the code for sock_no_fcntl() in net/core.c, I cannot specify "0" as a value for F_SETOWN, unless I'm the superuser. I believe this to be a bug, it stops de-registering an interest in SIGURG signals. Let me know if you want a patch.
Cheers Chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |