lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN? (fwd)

Resend (no response first time)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:09:09 +0000 (GMT)
From: Chris Evans <chris@scary.beasts.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@redhat.com
Subject: 2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN?


Hi,

Looking at the code for sock_no_fcntl() in net/core.c, I cannot specify
"0" as a value for F_SETOWN, unless I'm the superuser. I believe this to
be a bug, it stops de-registering an interest in SIGURG signals. Let me
know if you want a patch.

Cheers
Chris


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.038 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site