[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4.4-ac10
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:40:39PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:33:36PM +0200, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> > With 2.4.4-ac10 and binutils 2.11 I get the following warnings:
> It is a warning about kernel code using assembler statements
> which are not valid with some older assemblers.

Naeh, I am confusing (you, and myself). Fixing those (adding the '*')
would not work with some older assemblers.

Claiming minimum level of 2.10/2.11 for assembler/binutils would
certainly allow fixing things by adding the missing '*'.

> > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.4-ac/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -c -o pci-pc.o pci-pc.c
> > pci-pc.c:964: warning: `pci_fixup_via691' defined but not used
> > pci-pc.c:977: warning: `pci_fixup_via691_2' defined but not used
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:747: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:832: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:919: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:958: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.122 / U:0.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site