Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 15 May 2001 02:08:45 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants |
| |
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Nobody really uses it because it would require you to add a line or two to > > your init scripts to pick up the major number from /proc/devices, and > > that's obviously too hard. Much better to just hardcode randome numbers, > > right? > > modprobe ?
I was being ironic.
Yes, it's used. Not very widely at all, and historically what has actually happened is that people have used the dynamic numbers for a while, but in order to become "real members of society" they've applied for a real static major number even if the dynamic one worked fine.
Silly, yes.
Note that my whole argument is that we do NOT need more of the static numbers, and we should NOT expand the major number space unnecessarily. We _can_ make do with devfs (trivially - no need to do anything at all, as devfs already handles the case of dynamic major numbers quite well).
But the fact remains that some users want to (a) avoid devfs and (b) have static maintenance. And I'm ok with that too, but only if the static major number is in the form of a _generic_ number that has absolutely nothing to do with any specific drivers (which is why I'd be perfecly ok with still adding a "disk" major number, but which is why I do NOT want to have Peter give out "the random number of today" to various stupid device drivers).
So we seem to be in violent agreement here.
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |