[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Getting FS access events

On Tue, 15 May 2001, Richard Gooch wrote:
> However, what about simply invalidating an entry in the buffer cache
> when you do a write from the page cache?

And how do you do the invalidate the other way, pray tell?

What happens if you create a buffer cache entry? Does that invalidate the
page cache one? Or do you just allow invalidates one way, and not the
other? And why=

> Actually, I'd kind of like it if the page cache steals from the buffer
> cache on read. The buffer cache is mostly populated by fsck. Once I've
> done the fsck, those buffers are useless to me. They might be useful
> again if they are steal-able by the page cache.

Ehh.. And then you'll be unhappy _again_, when we early in 2.5.x start
using the page cache for block device accesses. Which we _have_ to do if
we want to be able to mmap block devices. Which we _do_ want to do (hint:
DVD's etc).

Face it. What you ask for is stupid and fundamentally unworkable.

Tell me WHY you are completely ignoring my arguments, when I (a) tell you
why your way is bad and stupid (and when you ignore the arguments, don't
complain when I call you stupid) and (b) I give you alternate ways to do
the same thing, except my suggestion is _faster_ and has none of the
downside yours has.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:53    [W:0.135 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site